Recent Blog Posts

Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text.

Showing posts with the label HighCourtShow All
Proceedings under SARFESI Act - Disclosure of true, complete and correct facts was very basis of writ jurisdiction- P&H High Court in Suresh Kumar Gaba v. Bank of Baroda, (DB) (02.05.2023)

Proceedings under SARFESI Act - Disclosure of true, complete and correct facts was very basis of writ jurisdiction- P&H High Court in Suresh Kumar Gaba v. Bank of Baroda, (DB) (02.05.2023)

SLA PHHC

Proceedings under SARFESI Act -Disclosure of true, complete and correct facts was very basis of writ jurisdiction - P&H High Court in Suresh Kuma…

Yashdeep Chahal v. Union of India, (Delhi)(DB) (24.01.2023) : State directed to set-up one-stop centers in every District in compliance of the judgment of the Apex Court in Nivedita Jha v. State of Bihar

Yashdeep Chahal v. Union of India, (Delhi)(DB) (24.01.2023) : State directed to set-up one-stop centers in every District in compliance of the judgment of the Apex Court in Nivedita Jha v. State of Bihar

SLA HighCourt

DELHI HIGH COURT (DB) Before:-  Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ  and  Subramonium Prasad, J.   W.P.(C) 12787 of 2019 & CM APPL. 52252 of 2019. …

Once a person has been declared to be a proclaimed offender, what recourse is available to him under the law? The order under Section 82(4) declaring accused person a proclaimed offender is not an interlocutory order: P&H High Court. Avtar Singh v. Harminder Singh Kang, (Punjab And Haryana) (23.11.2016)

Once a person has been declared to be a proclaimed offender, what recourse is available to him under the law? The order under Section 82(4) declaring accused person a proclaimed offender is not an interlocutory order: P&H High Court. Avtar Singh v. Harminder Singh Kang, (Punjab And Haryana) (23.11.2016)

SLA HighCourt

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before:- Fateh Deep Singh, J. CRM-M No.12547 of 2016, CRM-M No.21891 of 2014, CRM-M No.15394 of 2016, CRM-M No.8701 of …