Posts

Showing posts with the label HighCourt

Proceedings under SARFESI Act - Disclosure of true, complete and correct facts was very basis of writ jurisdiction- P&H High Court in Suresh Kumar Gaba v. Bank of Baroda, (DB) (02.05.2023)

By SLA -
Image
Proceedings under SARFESI Act -Disclosure of true, complete and correct facts was very basis of writ jurisdiction - P&H High Court in Suresh Kumar Gaba v. Bank of Baroda (DB) (02.05.2023)   PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT (DB) Before:-  G.S. Sandhawalia  and  Harpreet Kaur Jeewan, JJ. CWP No. 19348 of 2022 (O&M). D/d. 02.05.2023. M/s Suresh Kumar Gaba and another - Petitioners Versus Bank of Baroda and others - Respondents Present: Mr. Rohit Suri, Advocate for the petitioner(s). For the Respondent:- Mr. Yuvraj Shanoilya, AAG, Haryana. Mr. C.S. Pasricha, Advocate and Mr. Sushil K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the respondent-Bank.   Constitution of India, 1950, Articles  226  and  227   - Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest -Act, 2002, Section  13 (2)  - Payment of outstanding loan - Notice and proceedings under SARFESI Act - Challenged  - Plea of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Yashdeep Chahal v. Union of India, (Delhi)(DB) (24.01.2023) : State directed to set-up one-stop centers in every District in compliance of the judgment of the Apex Court in Nivedita Jha v. State of Bihar

By SLA -
Image
DELHI HIGH COURT (DB) Before:-  Satish Chandra Sharma, CJ  and  Subramonium Prasad, J.   W.P.(C) 12787 of 2019 & CM APPL. 52252 of 2019. D/d. 24.01.2023.   Yashdeep Chahal - Petitioner Versus Union Of India & Ors. – Respondents   For the Petitioner:- Mr. Chirag Madan, Mr. G Sai Krishna Kumar, Ms. Ravleen Sabarwal, Ms. Smirdhi Sharma, Mr. Deepesh Bahadur, Advocates.   For the UOI:- Mr. Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC, Mr. Amit Gupta, Mr. Kamal Digpaul, Mr. Sahaj Garg, Ms. Swati Kwatra, Advocates.   For the Respondent No. 3:- Mr. Nitin Sharma, Mr. Sumant Narang, Mr. Ranjeet Singh Sindhu, Ms. Nisha Bhambani, Mr. Rajat Arora, Ms. Mariya Shahab, Advocates.   For the Respondent No. 4:- Mr. Atul Batra, Mr. Kundan Mishra, Advocates.   For the Respondent No. 5:- Mr. Shahrukh Ejaz, Ms. Harnek Kaur, Advocates.   For the Respondent No. 7:- Mr. Tejas Karia, Mr. Gauhar Mirza, Ms.Amee R...
Post a Comment
Read more

Once a person has been declared to be a proclaimed offender, what recourse is available to him under the law? The order under Section 82(4) declaring accused person a proclaimed offender is not an interlocutory order: P&H High Court. Avtar Singh v. Harminder Singh Kang, (Punjab And Haryana) (23.11.2016)

By SLA -
Image
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT Before:- Fateh Deep Singh, J. CRM-M No.12547 of 2016, CRM-M No.21891 of 2014, CRM-M No.15394 of 2016, CRM-M No.8701 of 2016, CRM-M No.3451 of 2016, CRM-M No.21686 of 2016, CRM-M No.19357 of 2016, CRM-M No.3824 of 2016, CRM-M No.19308 of 2014 (O&M), CRM-M No.43371 of 2015, CRM-M No.16762 of 2016, CRM-M No.44285 of 2015, CRM-M No.26370 of 2015, CRM-M No.26746 of 2015, CRM-M No.5341 of 2016, CRM-M No.2508o 2016, CRM-M No.14238 of 2016, CRM-M No.5470 of 2016, CRM-M No.7098 of 2016, CRM-M No.5793 of 2016, CRM-M No.40522 of 2015, CRM-M No.2317 of 2016, CRM-M No.4776 of 2016, CRM-M No.7272 of 2015, CRM-M No.13004 of 2016 (O&M), CRM-M No.14245 of 2016, CRM-M No.8071 of 2016, CRM-M No.25835 of 2015, CRM-M No.17061 of 2016, CRM-M No.12525 of 2015, CRM-M No.17878 of 2016, CRM-M No.16847 of 2016, CRM-M No.12394 of 2016, CRM-M No.5311 of 2016. D/d. 23.11.2016. Avtar Singh And Others - Petitioners Versus Harminder Singh Kang And Others – Respondents For the Peti...
Post a Comment
Read more