Satish Law Agency

(I) INTRODUCTION : Rejecting Plaint is an appealable decree and appeal lies under Section 96 of Code of Procedure. So Under Order 7, Rule 11 CPC, a Plaint can be rejected only in cases enumerated in Rule 11 and not otherwise. For example, non-filing of the suit document is not one of the grounds on which, a Plaint can be rejected. Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C has dealt with various aspects relating to rejection of Plaint and this article deals with clause (a) and (d) only as most of the litigation is revolving around these clauses only.  Clause (a) thereof sets out that a Plaint is liable to be rejected where it does not disclose any cause of action, inasmuch as, upon a careful and meaningful reading of the Plaint as a whole in a non-formal manner and if the same is found to be manifestly vexatious and meritless, in the sense that it failed to disclose a clear right to sue such a Plaint is liable to be rejected under Clause (a) of Rule 11 Order VII C.P.C. The reject...

आखिर कब करती है CBI किसी मामले की जांच? जानिए कुछ महत्वपूर्ण सवालों के जवाब अक्सर हम अख़बारों में एवं न्यूज़ चैनल पर सुनते हैं की सीबीआई (केन्द्रीय अन्वेषण ब्यूरो) किसी मामले की जांच कर रही है, या सीबीआई जांच के हुए आदेश. पर क्या आप जानते हैं कि आखिर किन परिस्थितियों में और किन मामलों में सीबीआई जांच करती है? आखिर क्यूँ नहीं सीबीआई हर मामले की जांच करती है? कौन तय करता है कि किन मामलों में सीबीआई जांच की जायेगी? सीबीआई का क्या है इतिहास है यह कैसे करती है काम? हम यह सब आज के इस लेख में समझेंगे| सीबीआई का इतिहास क्या है? द्वितीय विश्व युद्ध के दौरान, युद्ध से संबंधित खरीद में रिश्वत और भ्रष्टाचार के आरोपों की जांच के लिए ब्रिटिश भारत के युद्ध विभाग में 1941 में एक विशेष पुलिस प्रतिष्ठान (एसपीई) का गठन किया गया था। बाद में इसे भारत सरकार की एक एजेंसी के रूप में औपचारिक रूप से दिल्ली विशेष पुलिस स्थापना (DSPE) अधिनियम, 1946 को लागू करके भारत सरकार के विभिन्न विंगों में भ्रष्टाचार के आरोपों की जाँच करने के लिए औपचारिक रूप दिया गया। वर्ष 1963 में, भारत सरकार की रक्षा से संबंधित गंभीर...

1. *Company Name Board-* Every Company shall paint or affix the name and address of registered office and keep the same painted/affixed, outside every office or place in which its business is carried on, in legible letters. 2. *Letter Head of Company-* Every Company shall get its name, address of registered office, CIN, telephone and email printed on all business letters, billheads, letter papers, notices and other official publications. 3. *First Board Meeting-* First Meeting of Board of Directors is required to be held within 30 days of Incorporation of Company. Notice of BM must be send to every director at least 7 days before the meeting. 4. *Subsequent Board Meetings-* Minimum 4 Board Meetings to be held every year with not more than 120 days gap between two meetings. In case of small company, it is sufficient to conduct only two Board Meetings. 5. *Issuing of Share Certificate -* Company is required to issue Share Certificates to the subscribers of memorandum within 60 da...

DAILY  LEGAL UPDATES Adverse possession - Suit for declaration of ownership on the basis of adverse possession - Not maintainable. (Madras) Contraband - Default bail - Challan not presented within stipulated time - Extension of time to file challan - Accused cannot be denied default bail merely on the ground that report of chemical examiner/FSL is awaited and some other accused are to be arrested - Bail granted. (P&H) Dishonour of cheque - Compromise - High Court after being satisfied that cheque amount with assessed cost and interest has been paid, can close proceedings even in absence of complainant. (H.P.) Ex parte decree - Defendant did not lead any evidence - Trial Court proceeded to hear the suit ex parte by taking recourse to O.9.R.6(a) in terms of O.17.R.2 of the Code - Such decree is an ex parte decree - Decree can be set aside on making out sufficient ground by defendant. (S.C.) Maintenance - No bar to Court to grant maintenance u/s 125 Cr.P.C. even when financia...

DAILY  LEGAL UPDATES Appointment of local commissioner - Appointment made to ascertain whether defendants have encroached upon suit property and raised a wall and installed a gate during pendency of suit - Order as to appointments of commissioner calls for no interference. (P&H) Dishonour of cheque - Dismissal of complaint in default - Restoration - Complaint dismissed for want of prosecution only for single default - Justice demands its restoration and decision on merit - Impugned order set aside - Complaint restored. (P&H) Offence u/s 211 IPC - Complaint qua alleged offence can only be filed by Court in writing, as offence u/s 211 IPC falls u/s 195(1)(b)(i) Cr.P.C - Petitioner thus, cannot be prosecuted in a complaint filed by SHO of Police Station who is a public servant. (Rajasthan) Review - Discovery of new facts - If review is on discovery of new matter or evidence and it is cause for filing such application, strict proof of such statement is a condition precedent...

Latest Judgements reported in Supreme Court Cases UPDATED WEEKLY Contact us for subscription of Supreme Court Cases Weekly by Eastern Book Company.  CALL NOW TO GET SPECIAL DISCOUNT ON THIS SUBSCRIPTION: +91 9888033716 buy other books from Amazon Armed Forces — Promotion — Non-empanelment as Lt. General — Improper assessment of confidential reports:  In this case there was change in method of assessment from figurative assessment of personal qualities and box grading to pen-picture assessment in confidential report of officers holding listed appointments, which was detrimental to respondent. Overall service profile of respondent presented before Special Selection Board was tainted by irrelevant and irregular considerations and warranted a change. Statutory complaints made by respondent were rejected. Relevant documents, namely, comments of Army Authorities also not supplied to respondent. Authorities concerned acted in excess of jurisdiction and in violation of p...

Latest Judgements reported in Supreme Court Cases UPDATED WEEKLY Contact us for subscription of Supreme Court Cases Weekly by Eastern Book Company. CALL NOW TO GET SPECIAL DISCOUNT ON THIS SUBSCRIPTION: +91 9888033716 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Ss. 12(5) (w.e.f. 23-10-2015), 12 & 13, 14 & 15 and Sch. 7 Item 5 — Application for termination of mandate of a de jure ineligible arbitrator by a party which itself had appointed such arbitrator:  De jure ineligibility of arbitrator appointed by person who is himself de jure ineligible to be arbitrator vide S. 12(5) r/w Sch. 7, reiterated. Appointment of such arbitrator is void ab initio and arbitration proceedings conducted by such arbitrator/awards passed by such arbitrator, held, are also void. [Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd.,  (2019) 5 SCC 755 ] Constitution of India — Art. 226 — Exercise of power under Art. 226 by High Court — Relief:  Framing of any scheme i...