Satish Law Agency

 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UGGARSAIN v. THE STATE OF HARYANA Date of decision: 03.07.2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 587 Diary Number 36099 / 2019 Judgment Case Number Crl.A. No.-001378-001379 / 2023 03-07-2023  (English) 2023 INSC 587  (English) Petitioner Name UGGARSAIN Respondent Name THE STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner's Advocate VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA Respondent's Advocate Bench HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR Judgment By HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

   SUPREME COURT OF INDIA THEIR WORKMEN THROUGH THE JOINT SECRETARY (WELFARE) FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA EXECUTIVE STAFF UNION v. EMPLOYER IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA Date of decision: 03.07.2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 588 Diary Number 3751 / 2021 Judgment Case Number C.A. No.-004152-004152 / 2023 03-07-2023  (English) 2023 INSC 588  (English) Petitioner Name THEIR WORKMEN THROUGH THE JOINT SECRETARY (WELFARE) FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA EXECUTIVE STAFF UNION Respondent Name EMPLOYER IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA Petitioner's Advocate UDITA SINGH Respondent's Advocate Bench HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Judgment By HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

   SUPREME COURT OF INDIA M/S SANVIRA INDUSTRIES v. RAIN CII CARBON (VIZAG) LTD Date of decision: 03.07.2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 586 Diary Number 3472 / 2023 Judgment Case Number C.A. No.-003834-003838 / 2023 03-07-2023  (English) 2023 INSC 586  (English) Petitioner Name M/S SANVIRA INDUSTRIES Respondent Name RAIN CII CARBON (VIZAG) LTD. Petitioner's Advocate VIVEK SINGH Respondent's Advocate Bench HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR Judgment By HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA  Date of decision: 03.07.2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 589   Diary Number 2512 / 2022 Judgment Case Number R.P.(C) No.-000154 / 2022 03-07-2023  (English) 2023 INSC 589  (English) Petitioner Name NEERAJ KUMAR Respondent Name STATE OF HARYANA Petitioner's Advocate V. MAHESHWARI & CO. Respondent's Advocate Bench HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Judgment By HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

Diary Number 18592 / 2022 Judgment Case Number W.P.(C) No.-000456 / 2022 11-07-2023  (English) 2023 INSC 616  (English) Petitioner Name DR. JAYA THAKUR Respondent Name UNION OF INDIA Petitioner's Advocate VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA Respondent's Advocate Bench HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL Judgment By HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI READ FULL JUDGEMENT BELOW:- SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before: H.M.J. B.R. GAVAI, H.M.J. VIKRAM NATH, H.M.J. SANJAY KAROL Dr. Jaya Thakur v. Union of India NEUTRAL CITATION NUMBER: 2023 INSC 616 The Supreme Court Tuesday held the third extension of service granted to Director of Enforcement Directorate Sanjay Kumar Mishra as invalid. The court, however, has allowed him to continue till July 31. A bench of Justices BR Gavai, Vikram Nath and Sanjay Karol said in view of the peer review being conducted by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) this year and to enable smooth transi...

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before:-  S. Ravindra Bhat  and  Dipankar Datta, JJ. Criminal Appeal No(s). 1378-1379 of 2019. D/d. 03.07.2023.   Uggarsain - Appellants Versus The State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents   For the Appellants :- Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, Ms. Parul Sharma, Mr. Shantanu Sharma and Ms. Deeksha Gaur, Advocates. For the Respondents :- Mr. Rakesh Mudgal, A.A.G., Dr. Monika Gusain, Mr. Himanshu Shekhar and Dr. Nirmal Chopra, Advocates.   Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section  302 .   Cases Referred :- Ahmed Hussein Vali Mohammed Saiyed v. State of Gujarat, 2009 [8] SCR 719. B.G. Goswami v. Delhi Administration 1974 (1) SCR 222. Guru Basavaraj v. State of Karnataka, 2012 [8] SCR 189. Jameel v. State of U.P., 2009 [15] SCR 712. Raj Kumar 2013 (5) SCR 979. Ravda Sashikala v. State of Andhra Pradesh 2017 [2] SCR 379. Shyam Sunder v Puran 1990 Suppl [1] SCR 662. State of M.P. v. Bablu 2...

Criminal Procedure - Sanction required even for acts done in excess of official duty under section 197 CrPC. Approver need not to be examined as witness by Magistrate when cognizance is taken by Special Court under Prevention of Corruption Act.- Supreme Court of India  in  A. Srinivasulu v. State rep. by The Inspector of Police (Supreme Court) (15.06.2023) SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before:- V. Ramasubramanian and Pankaj Mithal, JJ. Criminal Appeal No.2417 of 2010. D/d. 15.06.2023. A. Srinivasulu - Appellants Versus The State rep. by The Inspector of Police - Respondents With Criminal Appeal No.16 of 2011, Criminal Appeal No.2444 of 2010. For the Appellants :- Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Mr. Kaushik Mishra, Mr. Nishant Sharma, Ms. Adviteeya, Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma, Mr. Vijay Kumar, Mr. S Nagamuthu, Sr. Advocate, Mrs. V Mohana, Sr. Advocate, Mr. B. Ragunath, Mrs. N C Kavitha, Ms. Sneha Batwe, Ms. B. Pande, Mr. S.R. Raghunathan, Advocates. For the Responde...