NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA (Supreme Court) 03.07.2023

By SLA -

 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA




NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA 

Date of decision: 03.07.2023

Citation: 2023 INSC 589

 


Diary Number2512 / 2022Judgment
Case NumberR.P.(C) No.-000154 / 202203-07-2023 (English)
2023 INSC 589 (English)
Petitioner NameNEERAJ KUMAR
Respondent NameSTATE OF HARYANA
Petitioner's AdvocateV. MAHESHWARI & CO.
Respondent's Advocate
BenchHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
Judgment ByHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BNSS vs CrPC: 5 Critical Procedural Changes Every Lawyer Must Master in 2026

By SLA -
BNSS vs CrPC — 5 Critical Procedural Changes (Deep Dive Thread) Published: March 12, 2026, 6:30 PM IST    |    Category: Comprehensive Guides | Criminal Procedure Tags: BNSS 2023, CrPC 1973, Criminal Procedure, Bail, Arrest, Remand, Section 35 BNSS BNSS vs CrPC: 5 Critical Procedural Changes Every Lawyer Must Master in 2026 The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 with effect from July 1, 2024. More than a year into the transition, courts across India continue to see procedural errors by practitioners who have not fully internalised the new framework. This deep dive covers the five most critical changes that directly affect daily criminal practice. Change 1: Arrest Procedure — Section 35 BNSS vs Section 41 CrPC This is the most practically significant change for any criminal lawyer. Aspect CrPC Section 41 BNSS Section 35 Threshold Offence punishable with up to 7 years Offence...
Read more

Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Used to Settle Civil Scores in Property Deals": P&H HC Quashes FIR — Full Analysis

By SLA -
  FIR Abuse in Property Disputes — P&H HC Quashes Criminal Case Published: March 12, 2026  |    Category: High Court Judgments | Property Law | Criminal Procedure Tags: P&H High Court, FIR Quash, Property Dispute, Criminal Proceedings Civil Scores, Section 482 BNSS "Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Used to Settle Civil Scores in Property Deals": P&H HC Quashes FIR — Full Analysis In a strongly worded judgment that has significant implications for property litigation in India, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has quashed an FIR for cheating and forgery arising out of a land agreement dispute, holding that the criminal proceedings were instituted to escape civil liability and amounted to a gross abuse of the criminal process. Justice H.S. Grewal observed: "Criminal proceedings cannot be used to settle civil scores in property deals." The Core Legal Problem: Criminalisation of Civil Disputes One of the most persistent problems in Indian courts is the s...
Read more

SARFAESI Act 2026: Key DRAT Judgments — What Property Owners and Borrowers Must Know

By SLA -
  SARFAESI Act 2026 — DRAT Key Judgments & Property Owners' Rights Published: March 12, 2026    |    Category: Property Law | Banking Law | SARFAESI Act Tags: SARFAESI Act, DRAT 2026, Debt Recovery, Property Law India, Bank Enforcement, DRT SARFAESI Act 2026: Key DRAT Judgments — What Property Owners and Borrowers Must Know The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) has issued a series of important judgments in February 2026 that clarify the rights of both banks and borrowers under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). These rulings have significant implications for property owners, borrowers, and financial institutions dealing with non-performing assets (NPAs) in India. What Is the SARFAESI Act? The SARFAESI Act, 2002 empowers banks and financial institutions to enforce security interests — such as mortgages and pledges — without court intervention when a borrower defa...
Read more