Satish Law Agency

  NON-REPORTABLE   SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before:- J. B.R. Gavai and J. Vikram Nath CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 804 of 2011 Date of decision: 01.12.2022   Ram Pratap – Petitioner Versus The State of Haryana – Respondent   J U D G M E N T   B.R. GAVAI, J.   1.           This appeal arises out of the Judgment and Order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, vide which it set aside the conviction of the present appellant – Ram Pratap under Section 120-B of IPC, while maintaining the conviction for the offence under 302 of the IPC. The High Court also confirmed the sentence of life imprisonment. In so far as the acquittal of the other accused are concerned, the High Court maintained the same.   2.           The prosecution story in a nutshell is that the deceased - Om Prakash was on visiting terms with the present appellant/ accused-...

SUPREME COURT MONTHLY 2022 VOLUME 10 Click here to download https://1drv.ms/b/s!ArsBFvZPkSDrhGOPxC72jA51bHWW

Diary Number 32785 / 2022 Judgment Case Number R.P.(Crl.) No.-000282 / 2022 21-10-2022  (English) Petitioner Name MOHD. FIROZ Respondent Name THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Petitioner's Advocate SATYA MITRA Respondent's Advocate Bench HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI MOHD. FIROZ versus THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH 2. The Court after hearing the learned counsel for the parties passed the following order on 19.10.2022:  "Instant Miscellaneous Application is treated as Review Petition and be registered as one by the Registry. Oral hearing in the matter is permitted. ( 2)(i) and 376 (2)(m) of the IPC as well as under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. C) Though, the amendments to Section 376 were brought in force before the offence was committed by the appellant-accused, the amendment to the provisions of POCSO Act was brought into force, well after the offence was committed. ( D) In the circumsta...

Diary Number 33350 / 2022 Judgment Case Number / 0 22-10-2022 (English) Petitioner Name CHANDER PRAKASH WADHWA Respondent Name STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Petitioner's Advocate SANJAY KUMAR VISEN Respondent's Advocate Bench HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE, HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI Judgment By HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE   IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) DIARY NO.33350 OF 2022 CHANDER PRAKASH WADHWA VERSUS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. The petitioner is arrested in two cases. Blood investigations has been done but report is awaited. He has also family history of heart disease so proper treatment and investigation require in time. 6. Medical report of inmate says he is also suffering from trigeminal neuralgia. The medical report says that he also suffers from trigeminal nigeria. Petitioner has family history of heart disease so proper treatment and investigation require in time to prevent any heart attack. Ne...

Diary Number 44007 / 2018 Judgment Case Number C.A. No.-007611-007611 / 2022 21-10-2022  (English) Petitioner Name DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Respondent Name SAILENDRA SHARMA Petitioner's Advocate GAURAV SHARMA Respondent's Advocate Bench HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH Judgment By HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH In the present case, the dispute is with respect to three Dental Colleges, namely, New Horizon Dental College Research Institute, Bilaspur (for short, 'New Horizon College'), Maitri College of Dentistry and Research (for short, 'Maitri College'), Anjora Durg and Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Research, Bhilai (for short, 'Rungta College'). The Directorate of Medical Education notified the vacant seats including the vacant seats in the aforesaid three colleges on 29.05.2018 to be filled up in mop up round of counselling on the basis of intimation provided by the private colleges including...

Shiv Kumar & Ors. Versus Gainda Lal & Ors. (Supreme Court) (21.10.2022) The wife of the appellant no.1 died in a vehicular accident. At the relevant time, the deceased was aged 25 years and was a housewife. The High Court has committed a serious error in awarding the loss of dependency considering the income of the deceased at Rs.6,000/ per month only. It is submitted that the claimants shall be entitled to a sum of Rs.40,000 each towards loss of consortium or loss of love and affection. The impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court is hereby modified. 2. The wife of the appellant no.1 died in a vehicular accident. At the relevant time, the deceased was aged 25 years and was a housewife. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants original claimants has vehemently submitted that the High Court has committed a serious error in awarding the loss of dependency considering the income of the deceased at Rs.6,000/ per month only. 4. The High Court ...

  SUPREME COURT OF INDIA M/S TECH SHARP ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. Versus SANGHVI MOVERS LIMITED September 19, 2022 REPORTABLE J. INDIRA BANERJEE , J. J.K. MAHESHWARI  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 296 OF 2020  J U D G M E N T   Indira Banerjee, J .        This appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, he r eina f ter r efe r r ed to as the “I B C” is a g ainst a judgment and o r der dated 23 r d July 2019 passed by the National Company Law Appellat e T ribunal (NCL A T), New Delh i allowing Company Appeal ( A T) (Insolvency) N o . 118 of 2019 filed by the R espondent and setting aside an o r der dated 2 nd January 2019 passed by the A djudicating Authority, i.e., the National Company Law T ribunal (NC L T), Chennai whe r eby the A djudicatin g   Authorit y   ha d   dism i sse d   a n   applicatio n   file d   b y   the R espondent as b a r r ed by limitation. 2.  ...