SIDDHARTH MUKESH BHANDARI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT

By SLA -

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme Court Strikes Down Gender-Based Reservation in Army JAG Recruitment: A Landmark Victory for Gender Neutrality

By SLA -
Image
  Supreme Court Strikes Down Gender-Based Reservation in Army JAG Recruitment: A Landmark Victory for Gender Neutrality On August 11, 2025, the Supreme Court of India delivered a groundbreaking judgment in Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. v. The Union of India & Ors. [W.P.(C) No. 772 of 2023], striking down the Indian Army's policy of reserving a higher number of Judge Advocate General (JAG) posts for men than women. The two-judge bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Manmohan declared this practice unconstitutional and violative of the fundamental right to equality, ordering a shift to genuine merit-based, gender-neutral recruitment. courtbook +3 Add to follow-up View in file Supreme Court of India building, symbolizing constitutional authority and justice in India   legaleagleweb Key Facts of the Case The case arose from a discriminatory recruitment notification for the JAG Scheme 31st Course (October 2023), which allocated six vacancies for male candidates and ...
Read more

Latest Judgement: NCLAT : Order of AA initiating CIRP under Section 9 of I&B Code, 2016 set aside.

By SLA -
Image
The promoter of the Corporate Debtor have preferred this appeal to set a side the impugned order of AA  impugned order dated 20th September, 2019 under Section 9 of the I&B code preferred by M/s Aanav Construction Co. ‘M/s Aanav Construction Co’. moved an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short the ‘I&B Code’), pursuant to which the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), New Delhi Bench by impugned order dated 20th September, 2019 initiated ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ against ‘Shri Balaji Infradevelopers Private Limited’. However the Promoters/appellant  have settled the claim of all the 11 Claimants before the constitution of COC  and preferred this appeal . Therefore this appellate tribunal held that as the Promoters have settled the claim of all the 11 Claimants and the ‘Committee of Creditors’ has not been constituted, Appellate Tribunal in  exercise of powers conferred ...
Read more

Supreme Court Clarifies Fixed-Term Life Imprisonment: A Deep Dive into Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan vs. State of NCT of Delhi

By SLA -
  Supreme Court Clarifies Fixed-Term Life Imprisonment: A Deep Dive into Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan vs. State of NCT of Delhi In a landmark ruling that reshapes our understanding of life imprisonment sentences in India, the Supreme Court recently addressed a pivotal question: What happens when a convict completes a fixed-term life sentence without remission? The case of Sukhdev Yadav @ Pehalwan vs. State of (NCT of Delhi) & Others (Criminal Appeal No. 3271 of 2025, arising from SLP (Crl.) No. 17915/2024) provides crucial insights into sentencing, remission, and the right to liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. Decided on July 29, 2025, by a bench comprising Justices B.V. Nagarathna and K.V. Viswanathan, this judgment not only resolves the appellant's plea but also sets a precedent for prison authorities nationwide. This  post incorporates the full details from the Supreme Court's judgment, including its detailed reasoning on life imprisonment, remission distincti...
Read more